SDP reported that Seelan Palay has submitted a video about Francis Seow.
It makes one wonder if SDP is really pro-Singapore. As we all know, Francis Seow was accused of having received funds from the United States and advice for the purpose of promoting democracy in Singapore.
Unlike our revered Opposition figure Joseph Benjamin Jeyaratnam who took on the PAP lawsuits one by one, Francis Seow fled Singapore and lived in exile ever since. Not so surprisingly, he is now a US citizen.
On one hand SDP wants to rid Singapore of foreign labour and talents, but on the other hand it admires the Singaporean who had betrayed his country and gave up Singapore's citizenship.
It doesn't take much to show how SDP is actually anti-Singapore.
yay you're back
ReplyDeleteThanks for the encouragement.
ReplyDeleteDo send in articles if any.
When one gives up citizenship, one cannot be percieved to be a traitor. If the blacks from the south fled to the north during the days of slavery, would you call them traitors?
ReplyDeleteBy the way, the PAP receives funds from foreign countries all the time by way of taxing companies. Same thing done different way. You have to look at the end-result in this case.
What you have to do is to prove that Seow does not have democracy in mind.
You should try to be objective and evaluate all facts in your approach. Personally, i don't look kindly on the SDP myself for other reasons and also refused to join up with them when Chee asked me to do so a decade ago. But, we have to be objective about things and take people and parties to task on the basis of an unbiased evaluation of facts.
ed
When one gives up citizenship, one cannot be percieved to be a traitor. If the blacks from the south fled to the north during the days of slavery, would you call them traitors? (Please go learn American History 101. The Slaves were never citizens of the US in the first place--they were citizens of African countries)
ReplyDeleteBy the way, the PAP receives funds from foreign countries all the time by way of taxing companies.(No proof) Same thing done different way. You have to look at the end-result in this case.
What you have to do is to prove that Seow does not have democracy in mind.
You should try to be objective and evaluate all facts in your approach. Personally, i don't look kindly on the SDP myself for other reasons and also refused to join up with them when Chee asked me to do so a decade ago. But, we have to be objective about things and take people and parties to task on the basis of an unbiased evaluation of facts.(Since when is any group objective?)
ed
Hey ed,
ReplyDeleteHow did you manage to find out that Francis Seow does not have democracy in mind?