It was reported in Channel NewsAsia that:
"The lawyer, who has represented the Singapore Democratic Party in previous civil cases, was allegedly disrupting evening prayers at the Jamae Chulia mosque on August 3 at about 7.30pm.
The police said the lawyer is known to have behaved violently and abusively at places of worship, the Subordinate Courts, and other public areas."
Who should we believe this time round? Members of the public who witnessed the action of the lawyer in the mosque and other places? Or the SDP?
Reference:
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/cna/20080901/tap-065-lawyer-ravi-held-remand-imh-till-231650b.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please note that we will adopt SDP-style of allowing no-reply-to-comments-and-no-allowing-of-anonymous-comments approach